Identity Crisis: Protecting Yourself From Image Theft

For a photographer who makes their residing from licensing copies of our paintings, it isn’t enjoyable to see just how effortlessly pictures may be downloaded from websites, shared on social media, or in any other case used without consent or reimbursement. Even worse, to have one’s non-public likeness and photos fraudulently used to create a faux identity. I myself had been the victim of photo-robbery numerous times; maximum these days, I discovered that one of my commercially-to-be had snapshots appearing on over a dozen websites or even posted on an ebook cover… Notwithstanding in no way having offered a single license of that image.

Identity Crisis: Protecting Yourself From Image Theft 25

Image theft has usually been a subject. However, the era’s proliferation has made it clear easy to steal images – as clean as reproduction and paste. To show my factor: I just stole properly off the Getty Images internet site even as writing this text. (No, I want to call the law enforcement officials… I pilfered my own work.) Getty has copy protection measures in place, and when you hover your mouse pointer over the photograph, it pops up a larger version with a huge watermark over it. I appreciated the un-watermarked version of the picture better, so I hit the “Print Screen” button on my laptop and posted a display shot into my pix software (heck… A word processor might work as well). I cropped to the region I desired and in perhaps 60 seconds overall… Voila! Free content material. It probably would have taken even less time if I used my iPhone.

For an era raised on Facebook and Twitter, picture theft is not against the law of their minds or executed with malicious intent… It’s just a everyday part of everyday existence to share and re-proportion content. The most effective way to genuinely prevent our paintings from being shared to demise is never to put them up online at all. But that is no longer a sensible option in modern-day internet-enabled, cellphone-crazy society. So allow’s count on a worst-case state of affairs: you’ve got published your valuable pix on the Internet, and a few nameless people out there have maliciously grabbed a duplicate and used them without your consent. What are you able to do about it?


In America, you are the copyright proprietor of a photographic photograph from the moment you press the shutter button. This is the right information because Federal copyright laws protect our works from picture theft as soon as we create them. There are a few exceptions to this rule, which includes whilst a “paintings for rent” association is in effect. A purchaser is paying the photographer for the copyright to images. There needs to be no legal grey place in that recognize, as the photographer and purchaser could have a proper settlement saying as tons.

The horrific news is that the copyright mechanically granted through Federal Law no longer includes all of the bells and whistles, simplest the rights to shield our works and manage usage. It does no longer additionally allow for remuneration – the right to sue for financial compensation. To take a copyright violator to court docket and ask for money inside the agreement, the picture desires to have also been registered with Congress’s Library. There is a modest charge and paperwork to be filed in conjunction with copies of the photograph(s) to be copyrighted… Properly well worth the funding.

Identity Crisis: Protecting Yourself From Image Theft 26

It is crucial to observe that copyright regulation also imposes some limits on copyright holders. Fair Use legal guidelines exist that allow our pics to be used and reproduced without consent when it’s miles for the benefit of the hundreds. Typically, Fair Use falls below the kinds of information reportage, training, and other non-commercial makes use of. For example, a university professor may legally seize a website photo to use in a classroom presentation. But that identical image, copied off the internet site and published in a textbook available for sale on the campus bookstore, is now a matter of copyright violation.

A commonplace false impression I stumble upon frequently, particularly a number of the fashions I work with, is that being the problem of a photo by some means presents that individual copyright ownership as properly. In fact, being the man or woman in a photograph offers no copyrights whatsoever unless you have a proper agreement pointing out otherwise. However, you continue to have prison rights close to troubles like slander if the pics are used to misrepresent you or harm your reputation intentionally.


Don’t expect Facebook or Twitter to behave on your behalf if someone is stealing your images and posting them here. Their Terms of Service agreements (the ones long-winded texts we all conform to when creating our personal money owed) have verbiage in them designed to defend their businesses from legal responsibility because of copyright or Intellectual property infringements. I might go a step similarly and advocate that big social media, without a doubt, encourages picture theft and copyright violations inside the guise of content material-sharing and re-sharing. Anything that brings customers returned for extra posting, viewing, liking, and commenting approaches millions of greater hits on their pages and tens of millions of greenbacks in sales from all the blatant advertising they host there.

Where social media websites will include paintings on your behalf is in instances of Identity robbery. It’s predicted there are something like 80 million faux person profiles on Facebook on my own – lots of these used by advertising and marketing organizations or “bot” software to unsolicited mail us with marketing or to reinforce numbers in a fan base. But some are fraudulently attempting to play themselves off as a person they’re no longer. In the modeling industry, it’s sadly alternatively common that a version’s pics are stolen to create a fake online profile. The motives vary: maybe it’s a fan who is fishing for private pictures of the version. Or a disgruntled individual attempting to slander any other. I’ve also visible my version images stolen and used on erotic Escort websites; I ought to believe some clients are surprised whilst the girl who indicates up at their door isn’t the lovely model they picked out online. More ominously, faux profiles were used to gather real-lifestyles contact records from fashions like smartphone numbers, addresses, passwords, and greater.

Identity Crisis: Protecting Yourself From Image Theft 27

As with all felony subjects: if you have precise concerns, it is exceptional to are seeking the recommendation of a professional prison council. Attorneys are specializing in copyright issues or identify robbery. Most websites like Facebook have a page in their Help device wherein customers can report a faux profile or become aware of the robbery. If you find a faux online profile and your name and identity, please contact the hosting web page or service at once. ery.


It is honestly not possible to really protect your photographs after they had been posted online. Using most effective small, low-resolution versions of photographs may be a deterrent, however handiest for people who care approximately stealing remarkable imagery. Years ago, internet site coders evolved “scripts” to disable viewers from using a right mouse button to replicate and paste an image from a website. But it is easily circumvented by such low-tech techniques as the Print Screen technique I referred to in advance. Digital Rights Management and picture-tracking programs had been created to permit copyright holders to observe how and in which their photographs are being used on the line. But once more, those strategies are pretty easily defeated.

To date, the cheapest and nice alternative for preventing theft nevertheless appears to be the inclusion of massive watermarks on pictures. Yes, a semi-obvious logo across a picture does make our work a little unpleasant. But it additionally appears to be a flip-off to many ability picture copiers. And it acts as a big red flag, letting website visitors know that a person out there is using a photograph without permission. It’s no longer an idiot-proof technique; In my line of labor, many aspiring fashions do not seem to care if they’re posting an image of themselves with the words “Proof Copy” all over it. And watermarks can every so often be without problems eliminated in Photoshop. I myself have had one of my photographs stolen, the watermark removed, and the changed photograph then used on print flyers promoting considered one of Chicago’s largest annual parades. The be counted turned into resolved privately, and I might not expose any names.

Timothy Washington
Hardcore internetaholic. Social media nerd. General writer. Freelance travel junkie. Music practitioner. Twitter guru. Alcohol maven. In 2008 I was writing about wooden trains for fun and profit. Earned praised for my work researching fatback in Los Angeles, CA. Spent 2001-2006 lecturing about walnuts in Cuba. Earned praise for analyzing tattoos on Wall Street. Uniquely-equipped for deploying wooden horses in Jacksonville, FL. Spent a year lecturing about tar in Salisbury, MD.